▸ Trading Parameters
▸ Simulation Settings
▸ Presets
Background
This simulator is based on Rob Carver's quantitative analysis of funded trader challenges. It uses his open-source code to model the Raen challenge with exact parameters:
- Profit target: 20%
- Daily loss limit: -2%
- Minimum trading days: 30
- Monthly fee: $300 (free resets)
Key Insights
Rob's Recommendation: Use 15% volatility for best results. Here's why:
SR=1.5, Vol=15%: ~52% success rate, $2,100 median costSR=1.5, Vol=30%: ~31% success rate (much worse!)
The Volatility Tradeoff
Rob's Wordle Analogy: Trading challenges are like Wordle - you're balancing two competing goals:
- Probability of success: Higher with lower volatility (15%)
- Speed to completion: Faster with higher volatility (30%)
Why this creates a dilemma:
- Low vol (15%): Higher success rate (~52%) but takes longer
- High vol (30%): Faster completion when you succeed, but much lower success rate (~31%)
- The -2% daily loss limit punishes high volatility severely
Rob's solution: Optimize for probability, not speed. With free resets, multiple failed attempts waste calendar time anyway. A 52% success strategy that takes 2 months beats a 31% strategy that takes 1 month, because you'll need multiple attempts with the latter.
Methodology
The simulation uses Rob Carver's exact methodology:
- 256 trading days per year (not 252)
- Daily vol = annual vol / 16 (not √256)
- Daily mean = (SR × vol) / 256
- Compounding returns with drawdown from peak
- Monte Carlo simulation with 10,000 iterations
Bottom line: You need SR ≥ 1.5 with 15% vol for reasonable odds. Anything less is gambling, not trading.