▸ Trading Parameters

Sharpe Ratio 1.50
Volatility 15%

▸ Simulation Settings

Iterations 10,000

▸ Presets

▸ About This Simulator

Background

This simulator is based on Rob Carver's quantitative analysis of funded trader challenges. It uses his open-source code to model the Raen challenge with exact parameters:

  • Profit target: 20%
  • Daily loss limit: -2%
  • Minimum trading days: 30
  • Monthly fee: $300 (free resets)

Key Insights

Rob's Recommendation: Use 15% volatility for best results. Here's why:

  • SR=1.5, Vol=15%: ~52% success rate, $2,100 median cost
  • SR=1.5, Vol=30%: ~31% success rate (much worse!)

The Volatility Tradeoff

Rob's Wordle Analogy: Trading challenges are like Wordle - you're balancing two competing goals:

  • Probability of success: Higher with lower volatility (15%)
  • Speed to completion: Faster with higher volatility (30%)

Why this creates a dilemma:

  • Low vol (15%): Higher success rate (~52%) but takes longer
  • High vol (30%): Faster completion when you succeed, but much lower success rate (~31%)
  • The -2% daily loss limit punishes high volatility severely

Rob's solution: Optimize for probability, not speed. With free resets, multiple failed attempts waste calendar time anyway. A 52% success strategy that takes 2 months beats a 31% strategy that takes 1 month, because you'll need multiple attempts with the latter.

Methodology

The simulation uses Rob Carver's exact methodology:

  • 256 trading days per year (not 252)
  • Daily vol = annual vol / 16 (not √256)
  • Daily mean = (SR × vol) / 256
  • Compounding returns with drawdown from peak
  • Monte Carlo simulation with 10,000 iterations

Bottom line: You need SR ≥ 1.5 with 15% vol for reasonable odds. Anything less is gambling, not trading.

Processing...
◢ All Attempts - Cost Distribution
◢ Success Only - Cost Distribution
◢ Days to Completion - Success Only